On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Martin Kupec wrote: > Generaly you are proposing that there should be a special type of > footpring called 'via' and it should receive extra care.
Why single out "via" and "footprint" when they are merely members of an open-ended list of possible composite objects? > > I am ok with that, I just need to figure out how to handle mapping from > footprint layers to layout layers. I don't want concept of 'top', > 'inner', 'bottom' layer at all...that is too naive for me. A general mechanism for describing composite objects is needed. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user