Richard Rasker wrote: > OK, I'll start by reading up on the light vs. heavy symbol discussions. > Do I understand correctly that heavy symbols basically have certain nets > with predefined names (e.g. VCC, GND) implicitly included, whereas light > symbols offer the pins to connect those nets oneself?
Not quite. There seems to be a consensus, that hidden nets are bad style. At least, I haven't seen anyone advocate net attributes in the default lib. The main difference between heavy and light symbols is the inclusion of a footprint attribute and/or documentation links and/or simulation attributes, and/or license information. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user