On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 10:19 +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 22:20, Dan Roganti <ragoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wouldn't say wipeout, from looking at the current state of > > documentation, there's been a huge amount of work done there. I would > > suggest just making some additions and editing some parts to bring some > > attention to all of the important features. > > +1. There's lots of good documentation, but there are things missing > and lots of details need to be added. I think it would be a very good > idea to have some collection of documents (or at least link to these). > > I'm willing to help with the documentation since I do use gEDA > regularly (and i'm not much help with the programming). > > ~Abhijit >
What we really should consider: A lot of documentation can be bad. Consider the toys from the big company with the damaged fruit: A reason for the success of the toys is that documentations seems to be not needed. A lot of documentation can make people think that it is very complicated. For gEDA/PCB we have collected a lot of documentation over the years -- some is obsolete/outdated/redundant now or covers details, which most people are not interested in -- at least not when starting with gEDA/PCB. Send to geda-user: Sat Sep 10 13:34:27 CEST 2011 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user