On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:24:51AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again. > It just won't stick with me, that "solder" is supposed to be a synonym > to "top". I addressed the issue before about a year ago: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/31354/focus=31356 > Consensus seemed to be that top/bottom is the way to go. Since then, > the naming scheme of gerber export was changed accordingly. Same with > the default layer names of a new layout. But the rest of the code and > the docs is still working with solder/component. On some occasions, it > is even back/front side. > > I'd be motivated to prepare a series of patches to get away with > solder/component once and for all. Would be a bit of work, though. > So I'll ask before I spend hunting them down: Would such a patch > get applied (provided, it is well formed and all)? >
I'd vote for this. -- Andrew Poelstra Email: asp11 at sfu.ca OR apoelstra at wpsoftware.net Web: http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user