On Sunday 09 November 2003 22:35, Bill Cox wrote: > Logical vs. physical busses is an interesting notion that I'm not familiar > with. �For example, a PCI bus could be very complicated, but at the top > level, we could just call it PCI[145:0] (or whatever... I don't know the > correct length). �Individual signals would be assigned through the bus taps > at lower levels. �Is this right?
Hi, sorry for answering late, busy at work. Before I tell you nonsence I will check with the Cadence manuals more excact on the logical / physical connection topic. I burned myself badly at one time and have used physical busses ever since. Problem was that I never really grasped what I did wrong before I discovered the workaround... I'll come back to you on this. Kind regards, -- Svenn
