Thanks for the info (to both you and John). I'll try it out. The message board is completely empty, so I just wanted to make sure there were real users out there before starting to work with tclspice.

Bill

Stuart Brorson wrote:

I've used both LTSpice & tclspice. LTSpice is undoubtedly the more
full featured of the two. However, it is closed source & runs on
Windoze. Not that that is a bad thing, it's just that my main
working platform is Linux. You can run LTSpice under wine just fine,
but it isn't native. I have never used 3rd party vendor models with
LTSpice, so I don't know how easy that is.


As for tclspice, I use it most of the time since I know it pretty
well.  (After all, I have been contributing to the project.  My latest
contribution was to integrate GNU readline into ngspice's CLI.  The
old CLI was kinda crufty. . . . )   It does everything I want it to do,
and I particularly like the feature that you can write TCL scripts
to automate a SPICE simulation.  I have used this to do complex
circuit optimization.  Ya can't do that with LTSpice.  OTOH, I can't
speak for the quality/modernity of the device models.

Good work on gnetman. I will try it out soon.

Stuart



Hi.

I've got a nice path working for me from gschem -> gnetman -> LTSpice. I'm pretty happy with LTSpice under wine, but TCL-Spice sounds pretty cool.

Anyone out there had any luck with open-source SPICE?

Thanks,
Bill














Reply via email to