> With the schematic symbols, the standard gschem style is not > used. The all have pins on 100 mil centers. Since they are so > different, should I just leave them on my website or should I put > them on gedasymbols.org ?
*I* don't mind. I'd rather offer the user the choice, but marking them as to which "standard" (gEDA or compact) they use would be a good idea. > If there is interest, I will sort them out into tested and untested Another thing to note. > I am currently working on a CGI interface to footgen. I don't mind hosting CGIs on gedasymbols (the machine itself is quite capable of that, including psql and other tools. However, for security reasons, I don't normally allow just anyone to upload executable content. I'd rather review it and upload it myself. The system does allow for granting people that priviledge, though, if I think it makes sense to do so. Or, if you want to host the form on gedasymbols and the engine on your own machine, that's OK too. Whatever it takes to connect the users to the footprints ;-) I also don't mind helping with the cgi interface part, if that makes sense too.
