On May 19, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
John -- I downloaded the paper and took a look. It's great work, and I'm glad that you were able to do so much with gEDA! This paper has made my day! I also appreciate the mention in the acknowledgments! But perhaps you should thank the gEDA developers *afer* your chip comes back and is tested and proven to work . . . . :-)
The usual disclaimer on acknowledgments applies: credit where credit is due, responsibility for errors is mine as first author. I think we'll wind up doing the final layout verification sims both with ngspice and Tanner (Ikeda-sensei and the Osaka folks have that) just to be sure. I've used several SPICE flavors, and I've never seen one that didn't have a bug somewhere.
Do you mind if I post a link to your paper on sci.electronics.cad the next time there is a gEDA flame fest over there? I think it would buttress the claim that one can do serious work with gEDA.
Please do. It's there to be read. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
