On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:16:50 +0100
Frédéric <frederic.mantega...@gbiloba.org> wrote:

> But Geeqie runs on a real computer, where CPU is not a problem. So, why
> do we bother with this workaround? Why do not always hard-rotate the
> image, reset that boring EXIF flag (and the embedded thumbnail), so
> everybody is happy? That's what I do as soon as I transfert my pictures
> from the camera (using a script).

Because not everyone has their photos in Jpeg format. All my photography is in 
Canon raw and my editing is done through ufraw and GIMP. I want my image viewer 
to be exactly that, a viewer. I'm more than happy for geeqie to intelligently 
rotate the embedded JPEG before displaying it to me, but I don't want it 
modifying the Exif data and rotating the embedded image and thus confusing the 
rest of the workflow.

To me, an image viewer should never modify the source unless I explicitly 
instruct it to do so.

-- 
Jon Senior <j...@restlesslemon.co.uk>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Geeqie-devel mailing list
Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel

Reply via email to