Ok. I commit it after slicing up the processing. Figured it might be a good exercise. :-)
Regards, Dov On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Øyvind Kolås <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Dov Grobgeld <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Though I understand the implication, but as there are currently no >> readers that can deal with larger than RAM npy images, I suggest keeping >> the whole buffer approach for the first commit. > > > It is fine as a first commit, but the concern of not needing buffer-sized > allocations is a general concern in GEGL, this isn't really a critical > place; but dealing with it would be nice. :). > > /Ø >
_______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
