Comment:
I think all those renames are good.

- Martin N.



tor 2007-01-04 klockan 23:33 +0100 skrev Øyvind Kolås:
> I am doing some serious API renaming in GEGL due to merging of
> GeglGraph and GeglNode classes. The reason I'm doing the merging is
> that it seems to make it
> cleaner when writing a ruby binding, and that part of the code has
> some issues with
> using inheritance without transmogrification.
> 
> The global replacements I've done are:
> 
> s/gegl_graph_/gegl_node_/
> s/gegl_node_new_node/gegl_node_new_child/
> s/gegl_node_create_node/gegl_node_create_child/
> s/gegl_node_input/gegl_node_get_input_proxy/
> s/gegl_node_output/gegl_node_get_output_proxy/
> 
> Any comments? My plan is to push out 0.0.6 which will contain touch
> ups of the API
> as well as the build changes that have already gone into the tree this 
> weekend.
> 
> (PS: for a more up to date with svn version of the GEGL documentation
> see http://pippin.gimp.org/gegl/ , the version at http://gegl.org/
> will probably in the future document the last tarball release.)
> 
> /Øyvind K.

_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer

Reply via email to