On Fri, Nov 01 2013, Vlad Kozin wrote: > Interesting. I've been etagging scheme code to use with M-x > find-tag. It sometimes gets stuff wrong but otherwise doesn't seem to > require that project compiles. I suppose geiser approach should > produce a more reliable and fine-grained result. Unfortunately, I'm > just trying to explore some old repo with plenty of scheme files which > I have no idea how to compile, nor do I want to investigate :) > > This could actually be a feature. Fallback on find-tag in TAGS file if > geiser-edit-symbol-at-point fails to find one. What do you think?
Well, as you mention, geiser's modus operandi is very different from that of a text search using TAGS, and thus the two kinds of lookups are so qualitatively different that i'm hesitant to conflate both in a single command. Of course "fallback to TAGs" could be a configurable flag, so maybe it could be provided that way. Does anyone else have a take on this? Cheers, jao -- A man should never be ashamed to own he has been in the wrong, which is but saying, in other words, that he is wiser today than he was yesterday. -Alexander Pope, poet (1688-1744)
