res : Mungkin  itu  tradisi wanita tidak diikutsertakan, karena harus tetap di 
dapur untuk masak makanan dan jaga anak

http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2017/01/04/the-212-protest-beyond-the-presence-of-women.html

The 212 protest: Beyond the presence of women

Sabina Satriyani Puspita 
Doctoral student at Northwestern University’s political science department
Evanston, Illinois | Wed, January 4, 2017 | 09:38 am 



The 212 protest: Beyond the presence of women
Mass prayers: Hundreds thousands of Muslims gather and chant prayers during a 
rally stretching from Bank Indonesia to the Monument National in Central 
Jakarta on Dec. 2. The event was held to demand the jailing of Jakarta Governor 
Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama for blasphemy. (Antara/Sigid Kurniawan) 


Lailatul Fitriyah’s Dec. 15 article in The Jakarta Post that questioned the 
absence of women in the narratives related to the Dec. 2, or 212, protest 
raised several important issues pertaining to women’s political activism and 
liberation from discrimination.

She criticizes the narratives that dominate our society as having discounted 
the presence of women, who did contribute to the protest. Furthermore, she 
defines these narratives as “patriarchal politicoreligious”.

Within this kind of narrative, she further explains that the protest had 
systematically excluded the female participants. An example that she provides 
is the inequality of the Friday prayer space, most of which was prioritized for 
men, such that many women were asked to give up their space to men.

Finally, she claims that Islamic movements will potentially fail if these 
movements continue to marginalize Muslim women.

There are at least three caveats to Fitriyah’s critical analysis that merit our 
attention. First, investigating the mobilization of women in the 212 protest 
without fieldwork is an ambitious undertaking.

In order to understand what role women played in the 212 protest, observing — 
and not interpreting — how these women organized or contributed to the protest 
in the field is absolutely necessary.

Second, movements must not be conflated with protests. Movements organize 
protests. Protests are necessary tactics of a movement to achieve its political 
agenda. In other words, the two terms cannot be used interchangeably.

Third, Fitriyah is exercising precisely the action that she is critical about: 
presenting Muslim women as passive subjects. Thus, she reinforces the 
patriarchal politico-religious narrative that she is against.

Rather than determining a better answer to Fitriyah’s question, I prefer 
raising our awareness to learn about the success of the 212 protest in 
attracting many Muslim women to participate. Especially for those of us who 
contend with patriarchy and aspire to advocate for women’s rights or social 
parity with men, the question we need to reflect on now is how we can organize 
a political protest that emulates the success of the 212 protest in uniting and 
mobilizing that many women.

Reifying patriarchal narratives and practices is unproductive because such a 
move only obscures the real issue at stake. Julia Suryakusuma’s book State 
Ibuism ( 1998 ) demonstrates how Indonesian women are deeply divided by class 
as a result of the New Order’s political legacy.

One major success of the 212 protest, nevertheless, was that it united and 
mobilized women of diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

These women could be living in one of the four household models: a single-woman 
household, husband as-sole-breadwinner household, dual-earner household, or 
singlemother household. Consequently, each household model generates different 
sets of social and economic challenges.

Hence, uniting women as a group to mobilize politically is not an easy task 
because diverse socioeconomic backgrounds do not guarantee that all of these 
women embrace a singular political aspiration. The 212 protest, however, 
attracted these women to leave their paid work in offices or unpaid work at 
home, bring along their children and mobilize for the protest. It successfully 
converged the political aspirations of women across different socioeconomic 
backgrounds.

Religious piety alone cannot be the driving force of the Muslim women who 
joined the 212 protest because there were still some devoted Muslim women who 
did not participate in, or agree with, the protest agenda.

To end the perpetuation of patriarchal politico-religious narratives, we need 
to move beyond making assumptions about women, as those Fitriyah made. We 
should instead acknowledge and examine the autonomy of women as social actors.

As autonomous social actors, women are capable of making choices based on their 
own political aspirations. In this sense, we should not be indulging ourselves 
in the assumption that all of the Muslim women participating in the 212 protest 
and Friday prayer experienced subjugation when giving up their spaces for the 
Muslim male participants to pray.

Unless these women were evidently coerced physically or verbally, their action 
to give their spaces to their male counterparts may actually be one part of 
their many true aspirations for joining in the protest.

In Politics of Piety ( 2005 ), which discusses the women’s mosque movement in 
Turkey, Saba Mahmood shows how a woman’s aspiration to submit herself to a 
recognized authority for the common good is also a form of free will in its own 
right.

In this sense, the relationship between the patriarchal politico-religious 
narratives and the action of women who are willing to submit to others is less 
causal and more mutually constitutive.

A so-called patriarchal politicoreligious narrative does not simply shape the 
Muslim female participants’ submissive behavior, but is also constituted and 
perpetuated by the very actions of some women.

To clarify, this article does not align itself with the existing patriarchal 
narratives that tend to marginalize or disregard the role of women in the 212 
protest. Although I believe that completely annihilating patriarchy is a 
utopian notion, I am confident that delinking from patriarchal ideas and 
narratives is possible.

However, grumbling about already longstanding and robust patriarchal practices 
is unproductive and will only hinder dialogues between the ruling and the ruled.

Organizing a successful political protest, such as the 212 protest, within a 
patriarchal narrative necessitates offering an alternative to patriarchy — that 
is extremely difficult work that contenders of patriarchy and women’s rights 
activists need to undertake.

The work that has yet to be finished and requires our attention now can be 
broken down into two important points for reflection.

First, how has dialogue between women and men about social status parity been 
pushed?

Second, at a more fundamental level, exactly how has the dialogue among women 
with contending views about politics and social norms been going?

Ultimately, disunity among Indonesian women is fuel for patriarchal and 
misogynistic practices. Therefore, prior to demanding any political movements 
for the inclusion and recognition of women in their mobilization, addressing 
the autonomy of every woman as a social actor and uniting the aspirations of 
women across different socioeconomic backgrounds must first be resolved.

Kirim email ke