Good,
I used to use something like :
[3 (
|
[t b f]
| |
| ...
|
[bang(
|
[s banginit] (and a [r banginit] in abstractions.
and not the [loadbang( message. I have to use this method, right now.
No chance to have [initbang] in Vanilla ?
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-05/070353.html
++
Jack
Le 24 juin 09 à 16:53, cyrille henry a écrit :
Jack a écrit :
Le 24 juin 09 à 16:22, cyrille henry a écrit :
hello,
i think gem load an image only when sending a load message to
pix_image, so your 2 exemples should be the same.
OK, thanx for clarifications. I have forgotten that :)
by why do you use initbang when a loadbang is ok?
where does initbang comes from?
Because it is an abstraction loaded dynamically.
yep, i got it now.
here what i usually do with vanilla objects only.
c
++
Jack
c
Jack a écrit :
Here an abstraction where there is two possibilities.
There is some comments inside.
I would like to know if i am right about performance ?
It is what we were talking about Cyrille ?
Thanx a lot.
++
Jack
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev<Archive.zip>
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
