-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > So some other developers have released an updated version of FTGL. It > seems like mostly they are updating the code to work with modern > compilers and frameworks. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/ftgl > > Any harm in updating it? >
i'm not sure what you mean: the changelog.Debian says, that 2.1.3-rc5 is in use since june 2008. since loads of builds (including mine and PdX on debian) eventually depend on that, 2.1.3-rc5 has been tested for ages and no problems have been reported. personally i'm still using an old version of ftgl for osx-binaries, as i happen to have a universal binary for this version (whichever that is). same goes for w32. the reason is mainly to not have go through the trouble of re-compiling ftgl/freetype for these platforms. fgmasr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkryABsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRQmQCfXDVZM74H93YtsJe0owWud2kb ag0An1vc8ix+yz9R3EKE08orACPa0xbq =vQ7k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
