On Nov 25, 2009, at 2:11 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
All I am saying is that this is a technique used for a bunch of
code.
I think that newer versions of gcc do stricter testing, that's why
its
relevant.
all i'm saying is that one should not test for one thing in order to
get
properties of another thing.
your argument is, that the compiler has changed and now refuses (or:
refused then) to compile.
if this was for good reason, then the code should be fixed (in our
case:
to use the correct types).
if it was for no good reasons, one could try to circumvent the
compiler
(by taking hand-tailored measures)
anyhow, the problem is not the compiler. it is the header files.
thus the problem should not fixed for the compiler but for the
headers.
i guess any compiler since OSX-10.2 would probably bail out at the
very
same spot (and for good reasons).
could you try whether it works.
Looks like Gem built on 10.4 and 10.5, but I have a problem now on
10.4, so its my turn.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic.
It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and
expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on
terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev