-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > why does it has to be called "manual"? > shouldn't this "manual" path be (manually) settable via the -meta file? > >> "manual" is a pretty clear, widely used term for "long-form written >> documentation of a particular piece of project".. Why make it settable? >> That just adds complexity for no advantage that I can see.
whereas "doc" could mean anything from MD to word :-) > > and what is offered by Pd if it was indeed called "manual"? > i suggest to add all the libdirs to the docbrowser. > (and introduce libdir versions...) > >> I guess you haven't tried the Help Browser in recent Pd-extended builds, >> this is implemented, and will be folded into pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 > true i haven't tried it. that's why i'm asking. i'm currently travelling and would rather not have to download PdX. so does it do anything special about the keyword "manual"? or will it directly show all the libdir-directories in the help-browser, so a package could ship with "docs" and "exemples" and even "beispiele" and still be browseable from within the help-browser? this makes most sense to me, as it is surely most robust against the odd developer... (i'd prefer a system that allows for oddities and still provides a somewhat uniform user experience, rather than imposing/enforcing so called "standards") fgamsrad IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvks8sACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQ60QCeIYKmDxA0RJsyjolDLID/FdEf 544AoMog9hfuuECAlkKHF4cHl7+2CsBF =6SZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
