Feature Requests item #2827107, was opened at 2009-07-25 21:13 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507082&aid=2827107&group_id=64325
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: image processing Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Cyrille Henry (nusmuk) >Assigned to: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Summary: improve pix_data Initial Comment: pix_data is very usefull, but could be improved : - a quality 1 message could be add in order to set bilinear interpolation - a 32 bit mode could be add in order to read data from a 32 bit framebuffer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2011-04-18 16:47 Message: i've added bilinear interpolation to [pix_data], though i'd rather had [pix_data] be replaced by something like [pix_buffer_peek] (or a "peek" message to [pix_buffer]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cyrille Henry (nusmuk) Date: 2009-08-18 16:38 Message: ok, interpolation can be made in the patch, but it would be lot's easier to use it it is in pix_data. It also would be faster. so i think to have a "quality 1" message to pix_data would still be nice. You are right for the framebufer, i'll do another feature request. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2009-08-10 21:40 Message: bilinear (or whatever) interpolation could be easily done in the patch. as for the other request: [pix_data] does not know anything about framebuffers, but works on pixes, which currently are only 8bit per channel. however, it would be interesting to be able to query pixels of a render-buffer with high-resolution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507082&aid=2827107&group_id=64325 _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
