On 12/10/2011 07:14 PM, Jack wrote: > A version most based on [pix_writer] logic. > ++
do you think you could create a 100% compatible version using [pix_buffer]? i don't want to add yet another pix-writing object, but rather have the already existing ones collapsed into a single one. mfadr IOhannes PS: [pix_buffer] now takes [enumProps(, [setProps( and [clearProps( messages
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
