yes, still working here also.
thx
c
Le 13/07/2012 02:45, Jack a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 12/07/2012 15:44, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2012-07-11 12:35, SourceForge.net wrote:
>
> > Message: i confirm the fix thanks
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-07-11 00:15
>
> > Message: shall be fixed with 613c7d6
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Comment By: jack (jackovic) Date: 2012-07-07 06:23
>
>
>
> after committing the fix, i rewrote it differently.
> could anybody confirm that it still works?
>
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
Yes it is OK here with GEM: ver: 0.93.git 8a718ce
++
Jack
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP/2+6AAoJEOuluecjw8GUDAcIAKAehkI4vSuovI0RYDkhDN9Y
HNCqTU0bWf8SpY9YYoBN4Xob2oCI+nJAFsn/ldAdf7YxXoXeskZ8iFcwLMR/tiXU
2kStu82jBUtPnkRC4Hqj3ZxMT87blJZnd9hrqeQMwLoX2xBxTvvOW5DowF2fnhiZ
1q7d5erFJM6lrMEQSD68dZJnb/IoUQkScgfQ7CcEzOMuUlzOv6YE7HWZ/x8i+q2o
LEJPRatUjOHP8yq1rFTkorrSvDaZAgTiGauJU/GsNsC0zvRErbCeM4n6DlBz+Ok+
UnwEY6HyNv81YboiCJm327FW2aO8RRSQLvyaeoTDSl/4nDqpOhAiul/eZAQdT8s=
=///I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
