2013/3/19 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-03-19 16:06, Antoine Villeret wrote: > > this is in my github repos in the branch pix_share_write : > > https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/tree/pix_share_write > > hehe, i have incorporated your changes about 7 hours ago :-) >
thanks for that > > > > > I don't know if it's a good idea but it seems to work for me > > generally, i find it always pleasing, if an error is not (only) > printed to the pd-console but you get some message back into the > patch, so you can react on the error programmatically. > > > I'm wondering if it could be good to have a dictionary instead of a > > hash table : when we use [set id sizex sizey pixel_format( message, > > pix_share* could try to find the id in the dictionary if there is > > no entry with that id, it generates a random shmem id, verify that > > nobody else is using it and tries to allocated data if it fails it > > could generates another id until it succeed and store the id in the > > dictionary > > > > pix_share_read will know the dictionary and can find the right > > shmem id > > how is that supposed to work in two separate instances of Pd? > obviously, i forgot that whereas I'm sending id though OSC to other instance... and I see no other ways than sending the id on localhost... sorry for this stupid mistake cheers a > > fgamsdr > IOhannes > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlFIiw8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQxGgCePjlJJTseMuPVMhuYQGWkavgv > u10AoMhpJaE6OsdPQk7HbhmMM0W75aTo > =5+nU > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev >
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
