hey there,
i had a got at replacing pixes with glsl once, so i got pix_contrast
sort of ready,
maybe needs cleanup and some compliance to your project, like what glsl
version to use, rectangle or square textures, help patch etc
let me know, if/when you want it.
i ran into the problem, that i had to manually index all the input
textures, so it didn't really work as a drop-in replacement for pixes in
a complex patch.
would be good if there was a global variable to keep track of the
current index and automatically assigns the increment to next texture
created for an input.
and – yes – check out git, it's a great tool for all this code swapping. :)
cheers,
ub
On 30.08.2013 19:02, Jack wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Patrice,
Le 30/08/2013 15:04, colet.patrice a écrit :
> If it's not already made, I've got glsl_alpha (pix_alpha)
Yes, it is not made, so it is welcome.
Soon, I would like to release a 'trunk' of the abstraction, and so,
everyone can use that trunk and make glsl_ abstraction.
So let us define the best 'trunk'. That why I wait, I would like to
have the maximum of remarks from people using Gem.
++
Jack
> Sheers
>
>
>
>
> Patrice Colet
>
>
>
> -------- Message d'origine --------
> De : Antoine Villeret <[email protected]>
> Date : 30/08/2013 0:51 (GMT+00:00)
> A : Jack <[email protected]>
> Cc : gem-dev <[email protected]>
> Objet : Re: [GEM-dev] help with glsl abstractions
>
>
> good job !
> could be very useful !
> I have some too (to replace pix_movement for example)
> what is your working repo ?
>
> +
> a
>
> --
> do it yourself
> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
>
>
> 2013/8/28 Jack <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>
> Le 26/07/2013 14:03, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
> > On 07/26/13 11:44, Jack wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to create GLSL abstractions in the help directory, which
> >> would replace pix_ objects when possible. The name would start with
> >> glsl_ instead of pix_.
>
> > sound good.
>
> >> Is there any objection against this ?
>
> > no.
>
> >> If not, i would like to have acces to the git repository with write
> >> access. Is that possible ?
>
> > wouldn't it be easier if you just forked the repository, and made a
> > pull-request via github?
> > i really love the decentralized aspect of git.
>
>
> > mgfd.gasda
> > IOhannes
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEM-dev mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
> I started to make seven abstractions glsl_*.
> I would like to be sure, with the example attached, if i am on the
right path.
> Comments are welcome.
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSINAQAAoJEOuluecjw8GUDBUH/0QXOhxfbIEKGeviSzbVCACJ
+Ca1mIMKuhpHlDnruLK7y5YGCMPu3w1MG5riISM12mCxN9udz3hnS5A9bnQadZEv
bVZ9cXvEIOEdSWMnQ2tBXFlKdD8c0Fkd9lATj/0sGeRQS2aaH5guux+1gigsyE77
svzb6TejfOBdpqGrjOd+bEP2BCS1y3BZHW+lMkLudrG95aBf4/1QVWlETvUHNmjD
f6XXMRfaBjX7+vmpgWJFAV0DoqBzzG7DWwtcJa7ZKOmzdk/zNOzk21Y2FpvaKO7E
e6Lx6EeuQYo8Z+esPkRAIC8jrgSk54roshH9X7ANto7TMgEXJfbigK5sgHM/6fE=
=nMDE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
