SLICC people ok with this change?

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Nathan Binkert <[email protected]> wrote:

>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/716/
>   Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and
> Nathan Binkert.
> By Nathan Binkert.
> Description
>
> slicc: cleanup slicc code and make it less verbose
>
>   Testing
>
> Quick Regressions, Compile everything
>
>   Diffs
>
>    - src/mem/protocol/SConscript (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/mem/slicc/ast/AST.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/mem/slicc/main.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/mem/slicc/parser.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/mem/slicc/symbols/SymbolTable.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/mem/slicc/util.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>    - src/python/m5/util/__init__.py (3f37cc5d25bc)
>
> View Diff <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/716/diff/>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to