On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Beckmann, Brad <[email protected]>wrote:
> Overall this seems like a lot of work. So what is the benefit? It is just > reducing the number of binaries the regression tester needs to compile? I'm wondering the same thing... I agree, it would be sort of nice to have everything in one binary (or at least have that option), but is it that big of a practical gain? And wouldn't having that many more source files just increase the scons overhead further (independent of the SLICC parsing times)? It seems like we've got the original se.py problem solved (correct?), so it's not like there's a bug that really needs this capability to be fixed. Also, wrt compiling Ruby in by default... I think that's a good idea, but for modularity's sake it's still nice to be able to turn it off if it's not being used. Steve _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
