So far nobody objected to removing EIO in regressions.

Jack Harvard

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Gabriel Michael Black
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this would be a great idea anyway, since I've found it's pretty hard
> to use the stuff we have in config to do anything other what it's already
> doing or change things around in there without breaking something. If you're
> looking for something to do Nilay, restructuring the scripts so they're more
> modular, reusable, logically structured, etc. would be very useful in its
> own right.
>
> Gabe
>
>
> Quoting Ali Saidi <[email protected]>:
>
>> No complaints from me, except that i've pretty much decided the first part
>> of a new regression framework is a re-structuring of the config files so
>> they can be used in the regression framework. In fact, if the config files
>> were restructured, the new regression system would be pretty close.
>>
>> Ali
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
>>
>>> How about a new regression framework, assuming Ali isn't quietly putting
>>> the finishing touches on what he started?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think high on my list would be:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Making sampling via CPU
>>>> switching work (e.g. switch between timing and detailed mode over and
>>>> over again). This used to work, but some people have said it doesn't
>>>> lately and a regression test to go with it.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Multi-threading at a
>>>> system level (each System would run on it's own core and communicate
>>>> across specially designed Etherlinks or whatever)
>>>>
>>>> 3. CPI stacks from
>>>> the CPU model(s).
>>>>
>>>> Ali
>>>>
>>>> On 07.02.2012 12:12, Nilay Vaish wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Can people comment on some of the features they would love to see in
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> gem5, that it lacks currently?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Nilay
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> gem5-dev mailing
>>>>
>>>> list
>>>>>
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to