> On Feb. 9, 2012, 2:08 a.m., Gabe Black wrote:
> > tests/long/fs/10.linux-boot/test.py, line 30
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1033/diff/1/?file=23075#file23075line30>
> >
> >     I'm not sure you should do things this way. I think it would be cleaner 
> > to create a new configuration like realview-o3-checker.py which is the same 
> > but turns on the checker.

Yeah, now that you mention this, I found the actual config files for the 
regressions.  Will be posting a diff soon that will fix this.


> On Feb. 9, 2012, 2:08 a.m., Gabe Black wrote:
> > tests/quick/se/00.hello/test.py, line 36
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1033/diff/1/?file=23076#file23076line36>
> >
> >     The checker for the simple CPU doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. In 
> > that case it should just have a NULL checker.

This test is really just to make sure the DummyChecker object is getting 
connected correctly and doesn't error out when its connected.


- Geoffrey


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1033/#review2101
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 8, 2012, 7:48 a.m., Geoffrey Blake wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1033/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 8, 2012, 7:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> CheckerCPU: Make some basic regression tests for CheckerCPU
> 
> Dual purposes the se/00.hello and fs/10.linux-boot regression tests as
> tests for the CheckerCPU for the ARM ISA only.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tests/long/fs/10.linux-boot/test.py 8f354c5a1634 
>   tests/quick/se/00.hello/test.py 8f354c5a1634 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1033/diff/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiles.
> The se/00.hello an fs/10.linux-boot tests run to completion sucessfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Geoffrey Blake
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to