----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1239/ -----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for Default. Description ------- Changeset 9036:2e9bf0ce5aca --------------------------- sim: Remove FastAlloc. While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe. After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc when running twolf for ARM. Diffs ----- SConstruct 8b9f227b64d8 src/arch/x86/pagetable_walker.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/base/SConscript 8b9f227b64d8 src/base/fast_alloc.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/base/fast_alloc.cc 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/inorder/inorder_dyn_inst.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/dev/dma_device.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/mem/bridge.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/mem/packet.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/mem/request.hh 8b9f227b64d8 src/python/swig/event.i 8b9f227b64d8 src/sim/eventq.hh 8b9f227b64d8 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1239/diff/ Testing ------- Thanks, Ali Saidi _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
