-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1431/#review3508
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Seems fine.

- Nilay Vaish


On Sept. 21, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1431/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 21, 2012, 9:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch moves the block size computation from findBlockSize to
> initialisation time, once all the neighbouring ports are connected.
> 
> There is no need to dynamically update the block size, and the caching
> of the value effectively avoided that anyhow. This is very similar to
> what was already in place, just with a slightly leaner implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/bus.hh 7d506c3ef13d 
>   src/mem/bus.cc 7d506c3ef13d 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.hh 7d506c3ef13d 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.cc 7d506c3ef13d 
>   src/mem/noncoherent_bus.hh 7d506c3ef13d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1431/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to