-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1433/#review3509
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Seems fine to me.

- Nilay Vaish


On Sept. 21, 2012, 9:06 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1433/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 21, 2012, 9:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch changes the default 1 Tick clock period to a proxy that
> resolves the parents clock. As a result of this, the caches and
> L1-to-L2 bus, for example, will automatically use the clock period of
> the CPU unless explicitly overridden.
> 
> To ensure backwards compatibility, the System class overrides the
> proxy and specifies a 1 Tick clock. We could change this to something
> more reasonable in a follow-on patch, perhaps 2 GHz or something
> similar.
> 
> With this patch applied, all clocked objects should have a reasonable
> clock period set, and could start specifying delays in Cycles instead
> of absolute time.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sim/ClockedObject.py 7d506c3ef13d 
>   src/sim/System.py 7d506c3ef13d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1433/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to