-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1576/#review3758
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/cpu/testers/traffic_gen/traffic_gen.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1576/#comment3677>

    Do you realize that the class InputStream has a variable named trace? It is 
confusing two variables of same name in a file.


- Nilay Vaish


On Dec. 6, 2012, 8:21 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1576/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 6, 2012, 8:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9371:a9e189316c20
> ---------------------------
> cpu: Encapsulate traffic generator input in a stream
> 
> This patch encapsulates the traffic generator input in a stream class
> such that the parsing is not visible to the trace generator. The
> change takes us one step closer to using protobuf-based input traces
> for the trace replay.
> 
> The functionality of the current input stream is identical to what it
> was, and the ASCII format remains the same for now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/testers/traffic_gen/traffic_gen.hh 844f9e724343 
>   src/cpu/testers/traffic_gen/traffic_gen.cc 844f9e724343 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1576/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to