> On Jan. 8, 2013, 6:34 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote: > > I'm fine with this, but there is a pretty easy way to at least functionally > > handle this now with some of the code in 5963165c00cb. > > > > Ali > >
I am not in the mood to do it right now. I'll commit it as is. - Nilay ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1601/#review3792 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 5, 2013, 8:23 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1601/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 5, 2013, 8:23 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9382:91d6507bc912 > --------------------------- > x86 cpuid: enable clflush > Note that clflush is only being enabled. It is not implemented > in actual. A warning is printed if the cpu encounters a clflush > instruction. We need to enable this instruction in cpuid since > JRE 1.7 tests for it. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/x86/cpuid.cc 36ed6d4654bb > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1601/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
