Hi Nilay,
The link is symmetrical, so each side has a transmission time calculated when a packet is provided to the link and then delivered to the other side when that time expires. You could add an additional delay there, but it's not clear to me that it's any better than a single delay. Thanks, Ali On 29.01.2013 08:56, Nilay wrote: > I was going through the implementation of etherlink. Assuming I read and > understood the code correctly, while there is some delay involved in > moving a packet from an interface to a link, there is no delay when a > packet is moved from a link to an interface i.e. at the time of reception. > Should not the two sides be symmetric? > > -- > Nilay > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > gem5-dev@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev [1] Links: ------ [1] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
