Great initiative Nilay, that's my point of view.

To add to this, with the SQL stats (that are still alive, don't you worry,
there is more to come soon) the post processing and selection will be much
easier to automate.

Andreas

On 23/04/2013 20:47, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote:

>As long as you agree that we should move further on this, I can assure
>that I'll write a script that will post process the statistics so that
>one
>can have statistics for the ruby part in a format similar to the current
>one.
>
>--
>Nilay
>
>On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Beckmann, Brad wrote:
>
>> Hi Nilay,
>>
>> Sorry I haven't been able to participate in a lot of the public gem5
>> discussion lately, but this is one item that I want to make time for.
>> We need to be careful when making this change.  My primary concerns are
>> that we need to maintain that the ruby generated statistics are easily
>> readable and condense.  Unlike simple stats that are primarily parsed
>>by
>> scripts and used for graphs, ruby generated statistics are most useful
>> for debugging performance problems in the protocol.  Therefore it is
>> important to make sure we can get a global idea of how the protocol is
>> behaving without having to scroll through hundreds or thousands of
>> lines.  Ideally I would like to see us maintain the same format as they
>> are today with the per-controller counts and the summation all on the
>> same line.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>Behalf Of Nilay Vaish
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:01 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [gem5-dev] ruby: collecting cache controller statistics
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am thinking of allowing for using gem5's statistical variables within
>> coherence protocol definition files. I think this would help in getting
>> a better hold on how statistics are collected from the cache
>>controllers
>> in coherence protocols. The current method of calling a function in to
>> the cache memory class is largely opaque and not well maintained. Since
>> we would like to move away from ruby's way of collecting statistics (at
>> some point in time), it seems to me this would be a better way than
>>just
>> replacing 'int' variables with 'Counter' or 'Scalar' variables in
>>ruby's
>> profiler class. Also, it seems that this would allow easier addition of
>> custom statistics that one might want to have.
>>
>> Does any one has opinion on this issue?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Nilay
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>
>_______________________________________________
>gem5-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium.  Thank you.

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to