> On April 26, 2013, 9:54 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > Were you initially expecting that the definitions would have been generated > > when gem5 was compiled?
Nope. As the comment in the file suggests, you had to do execute protoc manually. - Andreas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1832/#review4295 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 22, 2013, 2:48 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1832/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 22, 2013, 2:48 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9671:819570becef1 > --------------------------- > util: Auto generate the packet proto definitions > > This patch simplifies the usage of the packet trace encoder/decoder by > attempting to automatically generating the packet proto definitions in > case they cannot be found. > > > Diffs > ----- > > util/decode_packet_trace.py c5b24e8ed428 > util/encode_packet_trace.py c5b24e8ed428 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1832/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran encode and decode without existing packet_pb2 > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Hansson > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
