Is there something that bothers you particularly about 00.gzip? It's already in the 'long' set, correct? Aren't there some other equally long-running tests?
I don't have any particular attachment to gzip, but I don't want to see it unfairly singled out... it seems no less valuable than many of our other tests. Steve On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > Let me ask the same question in a different way: > > Could those that want to keep 00.gzip voice their opinion :-) > > I will create a patch to prune it in the meanwhile. > > Andreas > > > On 22/05/2013 17:03, "Andreas Hansson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi everyone, > > > >How do people feel about pruning 00.gzip from the regressions? It takes > >quite some time to run (1+ hour for each arch), and I struggle to justify > >the time/energy spent. Does anyone think it adds value? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Andreas > > > >-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > >confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > >recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > >contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy > >the information in any medium. Thank you. > >_______________________________________________ > >gem5-dev mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > > > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
