-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1896/#review4406
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/mem/comm_monitor.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1896/#comment4130>

    You are changing the behavior of the code here since expects_response 
    and needsResponse are not equal in all cases.


- Nilay Vaish


On June 4, 2013, 10:49 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1896/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 4, 2013, 10:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9747:01d951b585ad
> ---------------------------
> mem: Fix CommMonitor style and response check
> 
> This patch fixes the CommMonitor local variable names, and also
> introduces a variable to capture if it expects to see a response. The
> latter check considers both needsResponse and memInhibitAsserted.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/comm_monitor.hh ea26ba576891 
>   src/mem/comm_monitor.cc ea26ba576891 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1896/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All regressions pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to