> On June 1, 2013, 9:24 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > I wonder what the intention was behind the cache builder.
With respect to the discussion that followed from this patch, please see: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1931/ - Andreas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1875/#review4358 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 23, 2013, 12:46 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1875/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 23, 2013, 12:46 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9732:3a81b8db9177 > --------------------------- > mem: Remove the cache builder > > This patch removes the redundant cache builder class. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/cache/SConscript 782b7284de21 > src/mem/cache/base.cc 782b7284de21 > src/mem/cache/builder.cc 782b7284de21 > src/mem/cache/cache.cc 782b7284de21 > src/mem/config/cache.hh 782b7284de21 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1875/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > All regressions pass > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Hansson > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
