On 06/24/2013 02:49 PM, Andreas Hansson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm keen to know what people think about the use of summary keywords in the
commit messages. I noticed that Nilay uses two keywords, one from
http://gem5.org/Commit_Access and then one additional (more specific) keyword.
Pros/cons? Is it suggesting a need for more keywords?
I'm in favour of using multiple keywords. I've generally used the format
"kvm: arch: summary" for my KVM-related patches and I think this might
be a good idea in general. For example, the O3 CPU is a pretty large
subsystem, so that should to warrant its own sub-keyword ("cpu: o3: ...").
However, we should probably try to "standardize" the keywords we use to
make it easier to search for relevant changes in the revision history.
//Andreas
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
