That would probably work. 

Ali 

On 29.09.2013 22:43, Steve
Reinhardt wrote: 

> I see... maybe we can add a flag to suppress that
output, and then use that
> flag in the switcheroo test?
> 
> Steve
> 
>
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote:
>

>> It's not really the switcher tests, is that simulation.py prints
every time the CPU changes occurs. I'm not sure how to fix one without
getting rid of that. Ali On Sep 28, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Steve Reinhardt
<[email protected]> wrote: 
>> 
>>> I noticed that *by far* the bulk of
the changes (in terms of line count) were in the simout files for the
switcheroo tests, which print the cycle number on every switch, and thus
are sensitive to small changes in
>> timing. 
>> 
>>> These files are
very large in general... in fact, I had to temporarily disable the 400K
'large file limit' on the server to be able to push
>> these tests to
not be so verbose by default, then update the reference outputs with the
(much smaller) result
>> 
>>> gmail.com">[email protected]> wrote:
>>
:5px; width:100%">changeset afd9ea6101d9 in /z/repo/gem5 details:
> 
>
_______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing
list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
[1]

 

Links:
------
[1] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to