On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Beckmann, Brad wrote:
I agree with Joel that this has been an interesting discussion. While there are questions about how these situations can occur and what is the best way to fix them, there doesn't seem to be anyone resisting the fact that this patch should be checked in, correct? I think it is very important that we not require protocols to always provide completely functional memory.
I still need to look into how checkpoints will work. With the current code, the existing checkpoints will not work at all.
-- Nilay _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
