> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 418
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line418>
> >
> >     We don't need this nack().

I changed the panic to a warn and left the nack in.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 496
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line496>
> >
> >     Is some code missing here?  You did not write anything to the output 
> > port.

The output port is really a bunch of GPIOs on the keyboard controller attached 
to a bunch of random things. It's not really worth implementing right now.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 557
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line557>
> >
> >     Do we need this change?  This does not exceed the line length limit.

Yes it does. If I collapse it back down, the semicolon wraps.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 590
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line590>
> >
> >     Do we need this change?  This does not exceed the line length limit.

Yes it does. If I collapse it back down, the closing parenthesis and semicolon 
wrap.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 593
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line593>
> >
> >     Do we need this change?  This does not exceed the line length limit.

Nope.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 602
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line602>
> >
> >     A single line seems possible.

Nope.


> On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 607
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line607>
> >
> >     A single line seems possible.

Nope.


- Gabe


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/#review5544
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 22, 2014, 1:32 p.m., Gabe Black wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 22, 2014, 1:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10555:595f40e72481
> ---------------------------
> x86: i8042: Give the keyboard controller a little TLC.
> 
> This CL fixes a few minor bugs, and fills out the general implementation a bit
> so that it can more readily support actually returning keyboard input.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/x86/i8042.hh 6317351a288c0349c5855c7431bc1eeade61605c 
>   src/dev/x86/i8042.cc 6317351a288c0349c5855c7431bc1eeade61605c 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabe Black
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to