----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2932/#review6656 -----------------------------------------------------------
Thanks! Some questions regarding a few parameters. src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py (line 460) <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2932/#comment5750> Really? I was under the impression that the vault controllers were simple closed page. See for example http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7095154 src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py (line 469) <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2932/#comment5751> I am somewhat surprised that we need values this high. With a 32 vault cube this would amount to an astonishing number of queued transactions (and there is probably no system out there that would even get close to even using 2048 outstanding transactions). - Andreas Hansson On July 1, 2015, 10:25 a.m., Erfan Azarkhish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2932/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 1, 2015, 10:25 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Minor fixes in the HMC vault model > This patch and the subsequent chain of patches aim to model a simple Hybrid > Memory Cube device in gem5 > Please apply the complete chain before running the simulation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py 73d4798871a5 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2932/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Erfan Azarkhish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
