-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3145/#review7330
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


I guess it should be "mem:" in the heading?

Also, what constitues noise probably depends on the observer in this case. I 
agree that we need some further classification though...

- Andreas Hansson


On Oct. 4, 2015, 6:24 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3145/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 4, 2015, 6:24 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11156:311127245c41
> ---------------------------
> cache: add CacheVerbose debug flag, filter noisy DPRINTFs
> 
> Some of the DPRINTFs added to the classic cache in cset 45df88079f04,
> while useful to those unfamiliar with the cache code, end up being
> noise when you're familiar with the code but are trying to debug tricky
> protocol issues.  (Particularly getting two messages from each cache
> as it receives a snoop request then declares that there was no match.)
> 
> This patch introduces a CacheVerbose debug flag, and moves a subset of
> the added printfs into that category, so that Cache by itself returns
> to being a more succinct summary of cache activity.
> 
> Also added a CacheAll compound flag to turn on all the cache-related
> debug flags (other than CacheTags, which you *really* have to want badly
> to turn it on, IMO).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/SConscript d660f0d38e3baa1bcaf5a570c270ffa8d98e1d45 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.cc d660f0d38e3baa1bcaf5a570c270ffa8d98e1d45 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3145/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to