-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7868
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (line 531)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#comment6816>

    It really irks me that we schedule this every clock period, even if there 
is nothing to do.
    
    Even if we don't make the model event based, could we at least make sure 
that it only ticks if there is something to do?


- Andreas Hansson


On Jan. 11, 2016, 5:58 a.m., Mohammad Alian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 11, 2016, 5:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11292:ed7527fcc338
> ---------------------------
> dist,dev: add an ethernet switch model
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/net/Ethernet.py 9d2364203316 
>   src/dev/net/SConscript 9d2364203316 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mohammad Alian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to