-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3464/#review8299
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/sim/syscall_emul.hh (line 411)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3464/#comment7114>

    Hello Sooraj, please remove this system call stub and use the ignoreFunc 
function above in "src/arch/x86/linux/process.cc".
    
    It does what you've done here with the stub for mbind, but doesn't actually 
add in the stub.


- Brandon Potter


On May 5, 2016, 6:22 p.m., Sooraj Puthoor wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3464/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 5, 2016, 6:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11595:b1f5e8d56292
> ---------------------------
> syscall_emul: implement newfstatat, mbind and faccessat syscall
> 
> newfstatat syscall is fully implemented but mbind syscall is ignored with
> a warning and faccessat syscall is redirected to the existing implementation
> of that syscall.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/x86/linux/process.cc e41eca4aecbb65d14e2d38d52d2264b375c00d70 
>   src/sim/syscall_emul.hh e41eca4aecbb65d14e2d38d52d2264b375c00d70 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3464/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sooraj Puthoor
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to