> On Aug. 12, 2016, 2:35 nachm., Matthias Jung wrote: > > Technically everything seams right. However, I think the x8 configuration > > could also be interesting as an default option. E.g. when people want to > > see the effect on their application when having more **banks** (16). I > > suggest to keep both configuration: one as _device_x16_ and another one > > _device_x8_. > > Wendy Elsasser wrote: > Hi Matthias, > I agree that the x8 (and x4) configurations are more interesting. Now > that we have public datasheets for all device widths, we have an internal > patch that we will upload shortly that contains updated configurations to > address your concern. > Will this suffice? > > Thanks, > Wendy
I think its okay when the patch comes soon. - Matthias ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/#review8606 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 11, 2016, 9:07 vorm., Curtis Dunham wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 11, 2016, 9:07 vorm.) > > > Review request for Default and Matthias Jung. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > mem: make DDR4 x16 > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/DRAMCtrl.py e9096175eb38ac39f37c91bfdf2a450b9664e222 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3596/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Curtis Dunham > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
