> On Nov. 14, 2016, 7:36 p.m., Michael LeBeane wrote:
> > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 236
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/diff/1/?file=63314#file63314line236>
> >
> >     These style changes seem out-of-scope.

Separated into patch: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3706/.


> On Nov. 14, 2016, 7:36 p.m., Michael LeBeane wrote:
> > src/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 222
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/diff/1/?file=63314#file63314line222>
> >
> >     Seems like an unrelated bug fix, should this be in a seperate changeset?

Separated into patch: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3707/.


- Brandon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/#review9060
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 7, 2016, 10:09 p.m., Brandon Potter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 7, 2016, 10:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11707:01d31dbe35c4
> ---------------------------
> syscall_emul: [PATCH 18/22] refactor and add functionality for dup, dup2, and 
> pipe
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/linux/process.cc 4a86763c0b30cccba0f56c7f48637a46a4663b06 
>   src/arch/power/linux/process.cc 4a86763c0b30cccba0f56c7f48637a46a4663b06 
>   src/arch/x86/linux/process.cc 4a86763c0b30cccba0f56c7f48637a46a4663b06 
>   src/sim/syscall_emul.hh 4a86763c0b30cccba0f56c7f48637a46a4663b06 
>   src/sim/syscall_emul.cc 4a86763c0b30cccba0f56c7f48637a46a4663b06 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brandon Potter
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to