-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3297/#review9193
-----------------------------------------------------------


I've posted an updated version of this patch which removes conflicts with a 
recent commit. We should coordinate which should be updated/reviewed/discarded.

- Matthew Poremba


On Jan. 23, 2016, 8:59 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3297/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 23, 2016, 8:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11299:483fab98c031
> ---------------------------
> ruby: Add occupancy stats to MessageBuffers
> 
> The most important statistic for measuring memory hierarchy performance is
> throughput, which is affected by independent variables, buffer sizing and
> communication latency. It is difficult/impossible to debug performance issues
> through series buffers without knowing which are the bottlenecks. For finite
> buffers, this patch adds statistics for the average number of messages in the
> buffer, the occupancy of the buffer slots, and number of message stalls.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/MessageBuffer.hh d1f8610cdffd 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/MessageBuffer.cc d1f8610cdffd 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3297/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> NOTE: The message count stat could be used as an alternative way to count
> total buffered messages RE: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3283/. Input on how to
> tighten things up is welcome.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joel Hestness
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to