That's fine with me! +1
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:54 PM Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks. We have a few unit tests now, and they are mostly consistently > named by adding test to the file name. For instance the tests for foo.cc > would be in footest.cc. > > There are two minor downsides to that. First, that's a bit ugly to read, > and it may look weird if files, for instance, use _ to separate words > instead of squishing everything together, ie foo_bar.cc -> foo_bartest.cc. > Second, if there already is a footest.cc which is not for unit tests (not > super likely, but definitely possible), then the naming gets a little > ambiguous. > > Would it make sense to mark tests with .test, so foo.cc -> foo.test.cc? > That's clear to read, more universally consistent, easily grepped for, and > will probably not be ambiguous. > > Gabe > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
