Hi Giacomo,

You *do* have permission :). Anyone can modify tests/jenkins/presubmit.cfg
and presubmit.sh. In fact, if you look at the history of the presubmit.sh,
it *was* running the old tests. See
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/testing/jenkins-gem5-prod/+/18028,
for instance.

The problem is that we can't distribute most of the binaries (e.g., SPEC
binaries). We could probably upload them to a private location on the
Google Cloud and have jenkins consume them that way, but I believe that
will be more work than it's worth.

I personally believe that putting effort into porting tests is more worth
everyone's time than trying to get the old tests to run, but that's just
my opinion. I'm happy to merge changes to run the old tests. I personally
believe we should only merge tests into the verification tester which
everyone can run locally, but I'm open to proprietary tests, especially in
the short term if we have a plan to make them not proprietary.

Cheers,
Jason

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:36 AM Giacomo Travaglini <
giacomo.travagl...@arm.com> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> It's really amazing that we have a testing framework in place, thanks for
> your effort!
> At the moment as far as I can tell we are only running tests registered
> within the new
> testing library.
>
> I was wondering if we could temporarily enable the system to run legacy
> quick regressions as well,
> while waiting for porting those to the new library. I guess it is
> something that shouldn't require a lot of work
>
> (just calling .util/regress I guess)
>
> I am saying this since a patch recently merged broke some syscall
> emulation tests and I think it would
> be beneficial for us to run the entire test suite straightaway while
> porting tests manually.
> I could even handle it myself if I had permission to configure the system.
>
> Let me know your thoughts,
>
> Giacomo
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* gem5-dev <gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf of Jason
> Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
> *Sent:* 16 April 2019 16:30
> *To:* gem5 Developer List; Rahul Thakur
> *Subject:* [gem5-dev] Continuous integration is live!
>
> Hi all,
>
> We now have initial support for continuous integration testing! We should
> all thank Google for donating the CPU time and infrastructure to run these
> tests. Specifically, Rahul Thakur has been incredibly helpful for the past
> two years in getting this off the ground. Thanks, Rahul and the rest of the
> team at Google who has been helping us set this up!
>
> Now, if you submit a patch to gerrit and receive a maintainer +1, "kokoro"
> will kick off a build / test of gem5. Once that is complete, you will
> receive a verified +1. If it fails, you will receive a verified -1. The
> logs can be viewed by anyone once the job is completed by following the
> link posted by kokoro (the https://source.cloud.google.com, not the sponge
> link). You can see an example on a patch I recently submitted here:
> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18068. Note that the
> tests take a couple of hours to run. However, I believe there is no limit
> to the number of different changes that can be tested at the same time.
>
> Soon, we are going to enable commit gating with the verified +1 tag. I.e.,
> you will have to pass the continuous integration tests before you can
> commit your code.
>
> Note that this is using the "new" testing infrastructure. You can run this
> locally by running "./main.py" in the tests directory. More information
> about how to run tests and add tests can be found in the TESTING.md file.
> If there are any questions/issues do not hesitate to contact me or the
> list. The documentation for the new infrastructure can still be improved.
> Right now, we're running about 30 tests. You can find the tests that we are
> running in the tests/gem5 directory.
>
> We are looking for volunteers to help us port more of the old tests to the
> new infrastructure and to expand the coverage of our tests. I'm happy to
> help anyone get started on this and point out which tests still need to be
> migrated, where our biggest coverage holes are, etc.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to